Most practice isn't practice. It's repetition — and repetition without feedback compounds errors as readily as skill.
The difference between a learner who improves over time and one who plateaus after a certain point almost never comes down to hours logged. It comes down to whether the practice is structured — whether each session targets a specific gap, whether the learner can identify what improved and why, and whether that understanding transfers to the next attempt rather than staying locked to the one that produced it.
The DART Method builds that structure into every cycle. You don't simply practice the subject — you attempt it, study what you couldn't do, apply that study, push past what studying alone can give you, then evaluate the whole arc honestly. The cycle closes, and a new one begins. Over time, the gaps get smaller. The understanding gets deeper. The work starts to feel — not easier, but more manageable. More yours.
Discovery is the standard starting point for every cycle — not an exception for the brave.
Starting with an attempt before any instruction isn't a quirk of the method. It's the foundation of it. When you encounter the gap in your understanding through the work itself — rather than being told about it in advance — you remember what you learn to fill it. The failure is productive. The struggle is the curriculum.